At least one Tory Senator is on the right side of this debate

Debate over the crime bill has been frustrating to say the least. It feels like the majority Conservative government prefers to put its fingers in its ears and ignore anything the public has to say about this issue. That is why it was very refreshing to see at least one Tory Senator come out against the pardon fee increase.

Please click the following link to proceed to the CBC website and read the original article online. Otherwise it is reprinted below:

Conservatives urged to rethink pardon fee increase

By Alison Crawford, CBC News

Posted: Sep 30, 2011 8:08 AM ET

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2011 8:02 AM ET

A Conservative senator is urging the government to go back to the drawing board on its proposal to quadruple the fees for seeking a criminal pardon.

Every year, thousands of Canadians apply for pardons in order to get a job, pass security clearances and travel. Right now a criminal record suspension costs $150, but the government is moving to a cost-recovery model for pardons and wants to charge all applicants $631.

Ontario Conservative Senator Bob Runciman said he thinks the National Parole Board should consider the complexity of each case when calculating fees.

“I think there’s an inherent unfairness in the approach the parole board is taking in recommending to Parliament, and hopefully we can change that,” he said.

Processing a pardon for shoplifting is more straightforward than processing a pardon for someone with a long criminal record or someone who was convicted of arson or assault.

Denis Ladouceur, with the parole board, testified about the process before a group of senators studying the fee increase.

“If it’s an indictable offence, then the act compels my staff to do more exhaustive verifications,” he said. “We need to go back to when the offence or offences occurred — the nature of the offence, the gravity of those offences.”

Senator suggests tiered approach

Runciman said he’d like to see an approach where there’s “three or four tiers based on the level of the crime committed.”

Francis Scarpaleggia, the Liberal public safety critic, is open to the idea of a tiered approach.

“Maybe that’s the kind of nuance we need when we’re looking at this issue,” Scarpaleggia said.

The NDP’s justice critic said his party opposes any fee increases.

For the government’s part, a spokesman for Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said calculating fees on a case-by-case basis would be time-consuming and make the pardons process more expensive.

A pardon doesn’t erase a conviction, but it allows people who have completed their sentences and shown they are law-abiding to have their criminal record “kept separate and apart” from other criminal records, the parole board says.


Leave A Comment

Recent Posts

Contact Us